Sunday 9 October 2022

Metaverse- How Much Does it Draw from Human Nature and Can it Nurture Human Nature?

During my readings, I came across couple of key concepts that explains in a way the evolution of Metaverse and gives a directional view towards the probability of its success. In the hindsight, it also tells us to keep a track of acclaimed scientific journals and books that explains human evolution; it can really allow us to create great products and companies.

Explanation of Metaverse

Let us first see what metaverse is. The concept is evolving and so is the definition. Two of the definitions closest to my thoughts are:

According to Piers Kicks (Investment Team at BITKRAFT Ventures) (Published in Forbes)- “The Metaverse: a persistent, live digital universe that affords individuals a sense of agency, social presence, and shared spatial awareness, along with the ability to participate in an extensive virtual economy with profound societal impact. 

The other definition and explanation are taken from "The Metaverse's evolutionary roots could aid its success" published in Mint and is written by Biju Dominic

The metaverse is an online 3D virtual space that connects users, who can adopt various incarnations or avatars, in all aspects of their digital lives. The metaverse will allow users to work, meet, play and socialize together in these 3D spaces. Clearly demarcated from the real world, this is a virtual world where the adopted avatars of people might differ from their real-world personalities.

Some Pertinent Questions

The metaverse is all about altered reality. Are humans keen to get out of the context they live in and stay in an alternate world? Are humans comfortable being someone else? Answers to these questions will determine whether Big Tech firms that are working to develop the hardware and software necessary for people to spend significant time and money in the metaverse will succeed or not.


Concept 1- Why social media has been successful- Power of weak ties  

Taken from "The Metaverse's evolutionary roots could aid its success" published in Mint 

During its evolution, humans have mostly interacted only with people they are close to, both physically and emotionally. These are their ‘strong ties’. There was little interaction with one’s ‘weak ties’, such as acquaintances and those with whom one only shares broad common backgrounds. 

Support of Scientific Journal

In 1973, Professor Mark S. Granovetter, then at Johns Hopkins University, published his paper, ‘Strength of Weak Ties’, in the American Journal of Sociology. In it, Granovetter reminded the world of frequent instances where one’s interactions with weak ties could be more beneficial than those strong ties. But the larger world really understood this latent power of one’s weak ties only with the arrival of social media. Social media companies established the fact that interactions with weak ties can have huge business potential. It is in this context that one should evaluate the success potential of the metaverse.

Concept 2- Multiple Avatars of Human Beings is Actually Fathomable 

Taken from "The Metaverse's evolutionary roots could aid its success" published in Mint 

The Hindu religion has always accepted that an entity can have multiple avatars. In fact, multiple avatars of the same deity are an established phenomenon in Hinduism. However, for the Abrahamic faiths, the concept of divinity became strictly singular. So it was not surprising that even in interpreting the personality of an individual, singularity became the norm. Traditional theories of human behaviour have typically considered the human personality to be singular. Any trace of multiplicity in one’s behaviour, more so if contradictory, was portrayed as a sign of duplicity. So most individuals took care to show only one consistent avatar to the outside world.

Multiplicity Finds Support of Scientific Journal

In standard economic models too, an individual’s identity and preferences were considered fixed. It was George Akerlof and Rachel Kranton in their article ‘Economics and Identity’ published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics who gave credence to the concept of an individual’s multiple identities. They contended that a person chooses various identities in varied contexts, this identity choice being one of the most significant economic decisions an individual makes. American developmental psychologist Howard Gardner too lent his voice to new conversations around the multiplicity of human nature. He put forward the theory that human intelligence is not a single variable, but a combination of multiple intelligences of varying proficiency.


Especially strong support for the existence of multiplicity in human nature comes from anthropologists David Graeber and David Wengrow in their recent book, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. In this book, they write about the concept of ‘seasonal duality’. Various human tribes across the world jump back and forth, over the course of the year, between distinctly opposite behaviours. In some cases, people actually adopt different names in summer and winter, literally becoming someone else during the course of the year. Many of these societies have two social structures: one in summer and one in winter, with two distinct sets of law.

Example of the behavior

For example, consider the Inuit community. In summer, they disperse into bands of 20-30 people under the leadership of a single male leader. During this period, property is possessively marked out and patriarchs exercise tyrannical power over their kin. But in the long winter months of relative hardship, there is a dramatic reversal. Inuits gather together as a larger group, and the virtues of equality, altruism and collective life prevails. Wealth is shared, even husbands and wives, among partners.

Verdict

So, the ability to consciously alternate between contrasting modes of life is an integral part of human nature and has been so ever since the species’ hunter-gatherer days. This human nature of regular oscillations between distinctly different patterns of behaviour bodes well for modern-day investors in the metaverse. It is now for strategic thinkers and designers who are working on metaverse projects to take advantage of this aspect of our inherent human nature.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/the-metaverse-s-evolutionary-roots-could-aid-its-success-11664988464102.html

"Opinions are my own”


1 comment:

  1. Re "The Dawn of Everything"

    "The Dawn of Everything" is a biased disingenuous account of human history (www.persuasion.community/p/a-flawed-history-of-humanity ) that spreads fake hope (the authors of "The Dawn" claim human history has not "progressed" in stages, or linearly, and must not end in inequality and hierarchy as with our current system... so there's hope for us now that it could get different/better again). As a result of this fake hope porn it has been widely praised. It conveniently serves the profoundly sick industrialized world of fakes and criminals. The book's dishonest fake grandiose title shows already that this work is a FOR-PROFIT, instead a FOR-TRUTH, endeavour geared at the (ignorant gullible) masses.

    Fact is human history since the dawn of agriculture has "progressed" in a linear stage (the "stuck" problem, see below), although not before that (www.focaalblog.com/2021/12/22/chris-knight-wrong-about-almost-everything ). This "progress" has been fundamentally destructive and is driven and dominated by “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room” (www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html ) which the fake hope-giving authors of "The Dawn" entirely ignore naturally (no one can write a legitimate human history without understanding and acknowledging the nature of humans). And these two married pink elephants are the reason why we've been "stuck" in a destructive hierarchy and unequal class system , and will be far into the foreseeable future (the "stuck" question --- "the real question should be ‘how did we get stuck?’ How did we end up in one single mode?" --- [cited from their book] is the major question in "The Dawn" its authors never answer, predictably).

    A good example that one of the authors, Graeber, has no real idea what world we've been living in and about the nature of humans is his last brief article on Covid where his ignorance shines bright already at the title of his article, “After the Pandemic, We Can’t Go Back to Sleep.” Apparently he doesn't know that most people WANT to be asleep, and that they've been wanting that for thousands of years (and that's not the only ignorant notion in the title) --- see last cited source above. Yet he (and his partner) is the sort of person who thinks he can teach you something authentically truthful about human history and whom you should be trusting along those terms. Ridiculous!

    "The Dawn" is just another fantasy, or ideology, cloaked in a hue of cherry-picked "science," served lucratively to the gullible ignorant underclasses who crave myths and fairy tales.

    "The evil, fake book of anthropology, “The Dawn of Everything,” ... just so happened to be the most marketed anthropology book ever. Hmmmmm." --- Unknown

    ReplyDelete